The current Greek crisis
has forced the importance of sound economic management into the public
consciousness, to a certain extent.
Greece is in a unique
position, it faces extensive external debts yet it has ceded control of its
monetary policy to the European Central Bank (ECB) as per the Maastricht
treaty. This has left Greece with austerity measures as the only solution.
These measures are exceptionally unpopular and have resulted in great hardships
being visited on the Greek people.
Were Greece in control of
her monetary policy, she would simply “print her way out of trouble”. What this
entails is a cutting of the interest rate which leads to greater money entering
circulation which results in a depreciation of the currency allowing exports to
increase and the economy to expand. Quantitive easing where liquidity is
supplied by the central bank to financial institutions other than commercial
banks is another method whereby central banks create liquidity (money) in an
economy.
Greece is bound by the
treaty of Maastricht to only allow Euros as legal tender in the country. This
means that Greece enjoys no central bank autonomy and thus cannot use monetary
policy as a solution.
Whilst the Greek
government and central bank are restricted by the provisions of the Maastricht
treaty, private Greek citizens are not. What this means is that a private
company (influenced by the relevant authorities and policy makers) can create a
virtual currency that enjoys large scale usage amongst the Greek populace, and
acts as an engine of growth. In this manner a crypto-currency is being
leveraged to function as a form of domestically created money. Crypto-currencies
are not defined as money according to the ECB (ECB: Virtual Currency Schemes,
2015).
My vision for this
crypto-currency, let’s call it the e-drachma, is that it will function
alongside the Euro.
It will come into being according to the
decisions of the creating entity. The e-drachma will not be loaned into
existence, unlike fiat money. The issuing company, on the advice of the
relevant experts and authorities, will provide e-drachmas to appropriate
companies to use it as a means of expanding production. The extent of e-drachma
provision will be in accordance with a company’s ability to employ domestic
factors of production. The government will also be provided with e-drachmas to
increase public sector employment. Salaries will consist of both Euros and
e-drachmas ( percentage Euro and percentage e-drachma).
Prior to its unveiling, a massive publicity
campaign should occur, encouraging people to accept it as a way of saving
Greece. The Greek authorities should strongly encourage large businesses to
accept it and these businesses (supermarket chains, restaurants etc) should
publicise their commitment to do so. The key element of money is its
acceptability. The only reason we accept someone’s notes and coins is because
we know the next business will, in turn accept the same from us. Generally, a
country legislates its domestic country as legal tender, “forcing” its
acceptance, yet dollars for example are universally accepted because they are
known to be universally accepted. Thus, without it being legislated the
e-drachma can play the role of a domestic currency due to widespread
acceptance.
The government can
motivate its acceptance by agreeing to accept a portion of taxes in e-drachmas.
The government can then spend this portion on salaries for civil servants. In
fact, employment can be stimulated by paying a portion of all salaries in
e-drachmas. E-drachmas will only be accepted from local accounts. Greek exports
cannot be paid for in e-drachmas. This is because Greece needs foreign earnings
to pay her debts. Furthermore, the e-drachma will then not be used to pay for
imports as it will have no desirability for foreigners. The resulting effect of
this is that Greek products will be relatively cheaper to those of other EU
countries, stimulating exports, job creation and economic growth, all without
breaking the provisions of the Maastricht treaty.
The prices of goods and
services will be quoted as x amount
euros plus y amount e-drachmas. Those goods that have more local inputs will
have a relatively greater e-drachma component, this will stimulate the domestic
production of goods and services.
The issuing company,
should have an arrangement with Greek banks so that a bank account reflects
both euros and e-drachmas and payment instruments are effective for both. Yet
no interest should be paid on e-drachmas nor any financial instruments sold in
lieu of them, this means that their sole purpose is to purchase goods and
services emanating from the real sector. E-drachmas would thus have a high
velocity.
As e-drachmas are not
loaned into existence, inflationary concerns are easily solved. If there is a
fear of hyperinflation “the tap is turned off” and new e-drachmas are not
created. If there are fears of deflation, more e-drachmas are created. In this
sense the e-drachma is identical to commodity money like gold and silver.
As the Greek economy grows and develops, the e-drachmas can be slowly eased out with less being produced each year until the Greek economy is capable of trading in Euros,solely.
As the Greek economy grows and develops, the e-drachmas can be slowly eased out with less being produced each year until the Greek economy is capable of trading in Euros,solely.
The above possible
solution ( to the best of my knowledge) does not contravene the Maastricht
treaty in anyway, yet it provides a creative and workable solution to solve the
current crisis.
No comments:
Post a Comment